McALLISTER TAKES THE STAND IN HIS DEFENSE

By Gregory J. Lamoureux

ST. ALBANS: After a day of evidence presented by the state on Thursday, the Defense took over Friday with testimony from Heath McAllister and ultimately his father Norm McAllister.

Heath quickly made it clear, at least as far as his testimony goes, Heath was the one that spent much of the time with the accuser the day that she first interviewed for a job on the McAllister farm.

That is in direct contradiction to the accusations by the state that Norm had forced, or at least coerced, the accuser of sex acts with him in the barn the first time they met.

[bar group=”86″]

Heath also went on to talk about how he had confronted his father about strange behavior with the accuser and his father in the weeks and months after Norm’s wife died of acute pancreatitis.

“At first he denied it,” Heath McAllister said, “but then he admitted that there was more to it” noting that the two were having a relationship.

That relationship, according to McAllister was a consensual relationship that the accuser originated.

The testimony quickly turned graphic as McAllister talked about their alleged consensual relationship that went on for months.

Norm was asked about the allegations of forcing the accuser to have anal sex with him. If you’d like source material to better understand anal sex, check out TubeV Sex.

He said that the two had a conversation about going down that road and that they decided to try it.

“She brought the KY and I took my pill,” McAllister said, referring to earlier testimony about having continued problems with erectile dysfunction that he has tried many products for that are similar to VigRX and the likes.

McAllister was also asked about the allegations of sexual assault in which he allegedly caused pain to the accuser while using his fingers to sexually please her.

[bar group=”86″]

McAllister claims that on that particular occasion he was stopping by to talk to her about working at the gardens on the farm and during the conversation between the two, the accuser let her bathrobe swing open and said, “Do you have a little bit of time?”

McAllister said that he took that to be the woman wanted to have some sort of sexual experience with him. He then followed her down a hallway in the mobile home and into the bedroom.

According to Mcallister they then both undressed and the sexual encounter began.

When asked about causing her pain, he said, “she seemed to be enjoying it so I kept doing it.”

The prosecutions had alleged that McAllister shushed the woman and said “good girl” when during this encounter.

According to McAllister, that never happened.

The County Courier has chosen to leave out the most graphic details of the testimony that both parties have entered in this case.

[bar group=”86″]

As far as agreeing to exchange rent for sex, McAllister also denied those allegations on the stand this morning.

Some of the last testimony that McAllister gave was that he had conversations with the accuser that related to going to farms to have sex, however, according to McAllister the woman was the one who initiated those conversations, and he had not played a roll in that.

The prosecution is expected to take over cross examinations in the afternoon with McAllister. Those cross examinations are likely to take most of the afternoon and it is not clear if the trial will conclude today.

[bar group=”86″]

Comments

Comments